I found people who asked when they would be available only to have someone else reply that the Access 2013 (or 2016) runtime is available. I weep when I think of all I am going to have to do to clean this mess up and go back to 32 bit on Access. So when I searched for "Microsoft Access Database Engine 2013 Redistributable" or "Microsoft Access Database Engine 2016 Redistributable" This along with the database compact functionality is all I need. The Database Engine is more limited and supported connecting to the database using either However, if you are planning for beyond that it’s worth considering that many people are still using Access 2010 or earlier. Alle derzeit installierten Pakete lassen sich deinstallieren, nur nicht die 'access database engine'. The current version of Microsoft Access, Version 2019 goes end of life in 2025, and our expectation is that the next version will be supported until at least 2028. Created by Joe Parys, Bruce Myron, Joe Parys Support. We will continue to invest in Access Desktop databases by expanding data connectivity, database management, and other features. Desktop databases have powerful features that make Access a popular way to create business solutions.
Quickly learn how Microsoft Access 2016 can make your life easier and more productive Rating: 4.6 out of 5. Access Desktop databases (.accdb) are not impacted by this decision. Nun will (muss) ich alle SW Pakete deinstallieren da ich wegen Kompatibilitätsproblemen mein MS Office auf 32 bit SW umstellen muss (bisher 64bit). Microsoft Access 2016 Master Class: Beginner to Advanced. In Access 2010, there was a difference between the Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable and the Microsoft Access 2010 runtime. Mit MapPoint2010 wurde die 'access database engin 2010 (english)' auf meinem Rechner installiert.
I have upgraded the main application from Visual Studio 2012 to Visual Studio 2015.Īt the same time, I am taking this opportunity to upgrade the Microsoft Access Database Engine from Access 2010 to Access 2013 or 2016. I have a application developed with Visual Studio 2012 that supports both Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server as a place to store the application's data. Last of all, the lack of a critical mass of Access questions may be a reflection of the SO communitys unreasonable hostility to Access as a development platform, which in turn is often the result of a failure to distinguish the Jet/ACE database engine (so often used inappropriately) from Access the front-end development tool (which can use almost any back-end data store).